本文摘要：According to Beijing Morning Post, a Redmi Note 3 smartphone, bought by a consumer in March 2016, spontaneously combusted while charging on Dec. 21.据《北京晨报》报导，一位消费者于2016年3月出售的一部红米Note3智能手机在12月21日电池时再次发生燃烧。
According to Beijing Morning Post, a Redmi Note 3 smartphone, bought by a consumer in March 2016, spontaneously combusted while charging on Dec. 21.据《北京晨报》报导，一位消费者于2016年3月出售的一部红米Note3智能手机在12月21日电池时再次发生燃烧。A Xiaomi official promised to refund and compensate the consumer on the condition of her signing a confidentiality agreement, prohibiting her from commenting publicly on the event.小米一位官方人士允诺对其展开付款和赔偿金，但是前提是该消费者签订一份保密协议，即禁令她公开发表对此事展开评论。The woman, surnamed Zhang, said that the phone started to discharge smoke 10 minutes after it began charging on Dec. 21. It then spontaneously combusted, burning the SIM card and her bed sheets.这位姓张的女士回应，这部手机于12月21日在电池10分钟后就开始起火。
而后再次发生燃烧，把她的SIM卡和床单都给烧了。Zhang added that she used the original charging device and did not know what caused the phones combustion.张女士补足说，她用于的是原装充电器，但是不告诉是什么造成了手机燃烧。
After several conversations with the Xiaomis customer service representatives, Zhang was promised a full refund plus an additional 600 RMB($86) as compensation -- just as long as she agreed to sign a confidentiality agreement.在与小米客服代表展开数次交流后，张女士取得了全额付款，另加600元人民币（86美元）的赔偿金--只要她表示同意签订一份保密协议。The agreement prohibited me from commenting on the event to any media outlets, or on public networks or communication platforms. It was like hush money, said Zhang, who ultimately agreed to sign the agreement.最后表示同意签订该协议的张女士说：“协议拒绝我不得在任何媒体、公共网络和其它任何传播平台公开发表此事处置的言论。
这哪里像赔偿金，真是就是封口费。”Not long after, however, a Beijing-based lawyer, Zhang Xinnian, argued that the confidentiality clause in the agreement was invalid. The merchants intention to cover up the complaint goes against relevant provisions of contract law.然而旋即之后，北京一位名为张新年的律师称之为，协议中的保密条款违宪。厂家的目的是为了掩饰滋扰，这违背《合同法》的涉及规定。Zhang also pointed out that, as there are so many Xiaomi smartphones on the market, the Administration for Industry and Commerce must launch a prompt investigation to minimize potential risks, ensuring the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.张律师还认为，由于市场上不存在大量小米智能手机，因此工商部门必需马上进行调查，将潜在危险性降到低于，确保消费者们的合法权益。
本文关键词：6688体育手机版登录,8688体育官网网页登录,196体育官网首页,8688体育官方入口
本文来源：6688体育手机版登录-www.shengxingw.com
